Here are links on Presuppositional apologetics gathered from July 8th-14th, 2014.
Archive for the ‘christian apologetics’ Category
Found this on Youtube of Dr. James White’s Dividing Line on the topic of apologetics’ methodology. Specifically Dr. White advances Reformed apologetics, also known as Presuppositional apologetics versus non-Presuppositional apologetics methodology.
It is three hours long:
Dr. White’s presentation is trying to show how theology matters–even in apologetics. I appreciate his look at one of William Lane Craig’s debate and contrast that of Greg Bahnsen vs. Stein debate.
Apologetic Sermon Illustration #24: Trying to Kill A Spider by burning down the House and how atheists argue
Posted in apologetics illustrations, christian apologetics, Christianity, Cornelius Van Til, Ginny Griffith, Presuppositional Apologetics, presuppositionalism, Reformed, spider, Van Til on July 9, 2014 | 10 Comments »
Point: Practitioners of Presuppositional apologetics will no doubt notice that an atheist’s argument often ends up destroying so many other necessary things in life and rationality in their attempt to dismiss the existence of God. This needs to be pointed out and yet in past experience, the significance of this is missed. The following analogy might help to get the point across of what is happening. It’s like someone trying to burn down their house–to kill something that is supposedly minor, like a spider.
Picture: On the news there is this story:
A Kansas woman was arrested after police said she went to extremes trying to kill a spider.
Ginny M. Griffith, 34, told officers in Hutchinson she set a pile of towels on fire at about 1:30 a.m. Friday in hopes of catching the spider and burning it to death, the Hutchinson News reported.
While it’s not clear if she ever caught the arachnid, the fire department did have to intervene.
Crews managed to put out the blaze without injury. The building suffered only light smoke damage.
Griffith, however, has been charged with aggravated arson. The other side of the duplex she lives in was occupied at the time, police said.
POSSIBLE SCENARIO FOR EMPLOYING THIS ILLUSTRATION DURING APOLOGETIC EVANGELISM
CHRISTIAN: Have you realized that in the last hour of our conversation, your atheism posed more problem than it solved?
CHRISTIAN: You ended up advocating self-refuting positions: laws of logic without law-like attributes, truth is all relative, ethical subjectivism while saying Christianity is morally wrong, etc. That’s a problem.
OPPONENT: But I don’t see why that’s problematic.
CHRISTIAN: I’ve explained throughout our conversation how it destroys your foundation for life and even for this very debate! I suppose an analogy might be appropriate. There’s this story I heard the other day…<Insert analogy>.
OPPONENT: That’s funny.
CHRISTIAN: Certainly she has problem with the spider. But do you think in the end she has created more problem than she solved in trying to get rid of the Spider?
OPPONENT: Of course!
CHRISTIAN: That’s the same thing you are doing!
Posted in Apologetics, apologetics methodology, Camden Bucey, christian apologetics, Christianity, Cornelius Van Til, Presuppositional Apologetics, presuppositionalism, Reformed, Reformed Forum, Theology, Van Til, Westminister Seminary, tagged Camden Bucey, defense of the faith on July 4, 2014 | 10 Comments »
If you listen to Reformed Forum Podcast you will be familiar with the name Camden Bucey who is the President of Reformed Forum and currently a Pastor at Hope OPC. He also has an Master of Divinity and a doctorate in Systematic Theology from Westminster Theological Seminary.
Dr. Bucey has taught a series on Presuppositional apologetics last year. The audio recording of those messages has been made available on the church website and are reproduced below. Click on them to download the MP3s.
6.) The Antithesis
7.) Common Grace
11.) Proof and Evidences
12.) Review and Examples
Thanks to Jeff Downs for pointing these out to us!
Posted in Book Review, christian apologetics, Christianity, Greg Bahnsen, John Frame, Perspectivalism, Presuppositional Apologetics, presuppositionalism, Reformed, Reformed Theology, Theology, tagged John Frame on July 3, 2014 | 4 Comments »
For those who want to get this book at a discounted price go over to WTS Bookstore online by clicking HERE.
This is a collection of various essays and articles written by John Frame over the years that hasn’t been published, with some being articles on his website and others being shared for the first time. For anyone who is a fan of Frame this is a great supplement to the many works that Frame has written over the years. Ideally those who have a little exposure to John Frame’s writings (say a book or two or some journal articles by him) will benefit the most from this book. John Frame can write very lengthy books so I appreciate the format of shorter essays in this book. In particular I found the first chapter that serves as a great introduction and summary of his perspectivalism. This essay is very important in light of how some within the Reformed camp have misunderstood his position as relativism. If some of his opponents have known about this essay it might have deterred some of the unhelpful criticisms of John Frame out there (or then again it might not).
I also found the various articles in part one of the book that focus on theological method to be a wonderful feast for the mind—in fact it’s probably the best part of the book. Specifically I enjoyed his discussion about contrast and exegesis, with his call for preachers and theologians to properly extract what exactly the Scripture is saying and then correctly noting what the contrast of the idea is; this is important when we say that the Bible prohibit or refute something and people often err in saying what the Bible is against when in actuality the Scripture didn’t prohibit or contradict it.
In part two of the book on theological meditation I appreciated his review of N.T Wright’s bibliology in which Frame showed how Wright overstretched his rhetoric when he claimed in the subtitle of a recent book that he has gone beyond the “Bible Wars” by offering another alternative. In reality Wright didn’t really offer anything new and it turns out instead that at times he is unhelpful because he isn’t clear or too ready with the cliché. At times Wright turns out to be still quite conservative in his view of the Bible despite how he rags on conservatives. Frame also did a good job of showing Wright’s complaint to move beyond the concept of infallibility is inconsistent with his job of being a Bible historian is still dedicated to defending the historicity of the Bible.
Surprisingly the shortest part of the book was the section on apologetics. Here I have to level a criticism of Frame’s review of Greg Bahnsen’s Presuppositional Apologetics: Stated and Defended. After going through carefully what Frame has to say, I thought the essay really was not a review of the book but more of a celebration and recollection of Greg Bahnsen the apologist. Frame criticized Bahnsen for being unfair to Gordon Clark, Carnell and Schaeffer but Frame doesn’t really demonstrate that Bahnsen really was unfair in his critique of these men. It was more of a comment made in passing rather than actual documentation it was so.
The last section was more personal and had several assorted pieces that reveal more of John Frame the man. If you are a big fan of Frame you would love this section and Frame is pretty funny. I recommend this work to those who want to understand more of Frame’s contribution to theology and apologetics and those who want to get every work by Frame. These two types of readers will benefit most from this book.
NOTE: This book was provided to me free by P&R Publishing and Net Galley without any obligation for a positive review. All opinions offered above are mine unless otherwise stated or implied.
Posted in Apologetics, biblical worldview, christian apologetics, Christianity, church history, Francis Schaeffer, Os Guinness, Presuppositional Apologetics, presuppositionalism, Reformed, Theology, tagged Christian heritage, francis schaeffer on July 2, 2014 | 8 Comments »
A British Christian organization called Christian Heritage over at Cambridge has featured an event back in May 15th, 2014 celebrating the life of Francis Schaeffer on the 30th Anniversary of Francis Schaeffer’s death.
Here’s a description of the event from the event page:
The 15th May was the 30th anniversary of Francis Schaeffer’s death. To many he was unquestionably one of the twentieth century’s most outstanding evangelical leaders. His influence throughout the church was vast. Had he not ‘buried’ himself in a small mountain village in Switzerland to start a little-known work called L’Abri Fellowship, committed to prayer rather than ‘advertising’, perhaps more would know his name. Was he a prophet? Did his extraordinary authority arise from a quite unique biblical analysis of our culture? Were his warnings and pleas not exactly what were needed? But was he – for that very reason – not also an uncomfortable prophet? Did his critiques of Evangelicalism not cut too close to the bone? Join us to find out more.
Here are the talks:
Thursday 15 May, 5.45 – 9.00pm
5.45 – 7pm: The Real Schaeffer byAndrew Fellows who is the Director of the English L’Abri Fellowship and Ranald Macaulay, Schaeffer’s son-in-law and founder of Christian Heritage
7.30 – 9pm: Schaeffer’s ‘True Truth’ byDr Os Guinness who is aprolific author and social critic
Are you looking for some memes when you teach to use in illustrating the method of Presuppositional apologetics? Or just looking for something funny and you are into Reformed apologetics?
Over our facebook page we have an album dedicated to Presuppositional apologetics. Check it out by clicking HERE.
And while you’re on facebook be sure to like it to keep up with our blog and have daily John Frame quotes on your newsfeed.