Atheist Matt Dillahunty has debated Christian apologist Matt Slick of Christian Apologetics Research Ministry (CARM) in at least three different instances over the last seven years. I thought I post them on here for the sake of convenience of anyone looking for them.
The first one is from 2009 for the Atheist Experience:
The second one is from the Bible Thumping Wingnut Show
The third debate is the most recent one. It took place on October 2nd, 2016 and the two debated the question “Is Secular Humanism superior to Christianity?”
Reblogged this on Talmidimblogging.
Thank you Vincent for the reblog!
My pleasure Pastor Jim 😊
Looking forward to listening to these! I often refer to Slick’s Christian Apologetics web site.
Nice! Great to hear you use CARM! I wish there were more apologists who are also biblically bent. Sometimes you have apologists who are great in philosophy but not so great in theology. I’m sure you yourself have seen that phenomenon among some of the top apologists out there…
I have to admit, Jim, my knowledge of the popular apologists out there is pretty shallow although I do know several of the most popular like Josh McDowell, Norman Geisler, Ravi Zacharias, William Lane Craig, and Lee Strobel, are pretty ecumenical when it comes to Rome.
Thank you for sharing these.
You’re welcome! I hope your Christmas weekend was blessed!
[…] 3.) Three Different Matt Dillahunty Vs. Matt Slick Debates […]
At 1:24:40 of the third or most recent debate, when Matt D. mentioned how both Matt Slick from his Christian worldview and he (Matt D) from his secular humanist worldview can make sense of “X”, Matt Slick agreed. Two problems. Matt Slick shouldn’t have agreed because he doesn’t believe Matt D can make sense of laws of logic from his worldview. Rather, M Slick believes Matt D is borrowing from his Christian worldview, or what I think is more clear is that Matt D was made in the image of God having certain qualities from God, and it’s that that he’s using to reason or make sense of X.