For today’s post we will tackle the question the Skeptic Annotated Bible asked: Was Jesus silent during his trial before Pilate?
Here are the two answers which the skeptic believes indicate a Bible contradiction:
He was silent.
“And while He was being accused by the chief priests and elders, He did not offer any answer. 13 Then Pilate *said to Him, “Do You not hear how many things they are testifying against You?” 14 And still He did not answer him in regard to even a single charge, so the governor was greatly amazed.” (Matthew 27:12-14)
“And the chief priests started accusing Him of many things. 4 But Pilate questioned Him again, saying, “Do You offer nothing in answer? See how many charges they are bringing against You!” 5 But Jesus said nothing further in answer, so Pilate was amazed.” (Mark 15:3-5)
He spoke many words on his own behalf.
“Therefore Pilate entered the Praetorium again, and summoned Jesus and said to Him, “You are the King of the Jews?” 34 Jesus answered, “Are you saying this on your own, or did others tell you about Me?” 35 Pilate answered, “I am not a Jew, am I? Your own nation and the chief priests handed You over to me; what have You done?” 36 Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, My servants would be fighting so that I would not be handed over to the Jews; but as it is, My kingdom is not of this realm.” 37 Therefore Pilate said to Him, “So You are a king?” Jesus answered, “You say correctly that I am a king. For this purpose I have been born, and for this I have come into the world: to testify to the truth. Everyone who is of the truth listens to My voice.”” (John 18:33-37)
(All Scriptural quotation comes from the New American Standard Bible)
Here’s a closer look at whether or not there is a contradiction:
- When dealing with skeptics’ claim of Bible contradictions it seems one can never be reminded enough of what exactly is a contradiction. A contradiction occurs when two or more claims conflict with one another so that they cannot simultaneously be true in the same sense and at the same time. To put it another way, a Bible contradiction exists when there are claims within the Bible that are mutually exclusive in the same sense and at the same time.
- One should be skeptical of whether this is a Bible contradiction given the Skeptic Annotated Bible’s track record of inaccurately handling the Bible. See the many examples of their error which we have responded to in this post: Collection of Posts Responding to Bible Contradictions. Of course that does not take away the need to respond to this claim of a contradiction, which is what the remainder of this post will do. But this observation should caution us to slow down and look more closely at the passages cited by the Skeptic Annotated Bible to see if they interpreted the passages properly to support their conclusion that it is a Bible contradiction.
- The skeptic tries to pit both Matthew 27:12-14 and Mark 15:3-5 as affirming the claim “Jesus was silent during his trial before Pilate” against John 18:33-37 as affirming “Jesus spoke many words on his own behalf during his trial before Pilate.”
- Let use see if both Matthew 27:12-14 and Mark 15:3-5 were properly interpreted as teaching “Jesus was silent during his trial before Pilate.”
- Matthew 27:12 states Jesus “did not offer any answer” and Matthew 27:14 states Jesus “did not answer.” So Matthew 27:12-14 does show at some point Jesus was silent during His trial before Pilate. The key word here is for a duration, but not during the entire time Jesus was before Pilate.
- In Mark 15:4 Pilate asked Jesus “Do You offer nothing in answer?” and Mark 15:5 states “Jesus said nothing further in answer.” So Mark 15:3-5 does show at some point Jesus was silent during His trial before Pilate. The key word here is for a duration, but not during the entire time Jesus was before Pilate.
- As stated above seeing both Matthew 27:12-14 and Mark 15:3-5 were properly interpreted as teaching “Jesus was silent during his trial before Pilate” I said the key here is Jesus was silent for a duration, and should not be seen as Jesus was silent during the entire time Jesus was before Pilate. That is not supported by the passages (note the lack of phrase like “the entire time,” “did not speak at all the whole time,” etc). Also in the context of both Matthew 27:12-14 and Mark 15:3-5 we see Jesus does speak to Pilate before Jesus decided to be silent so one can’t take both Matthew 27:12-14 and Mark 15:3-5 to mean that Jesus didn’t speak at all during His trial (especially the moment before He choose to be silent).
- Right before Matthew 27:12-14 in Matthew 27:11 it states “Jesus said.“
- Right before Mark 15:3-5 in Mark 15:2 it states “And He answered him” with this in the context being understood as Jesus being the one speaking and answering.
- In light of point 5 we see it does not contradict any passages where Jesus is recorded as speaking with Pilate.
- John 18:33-37 does affirm “Jesus spoke many words on his own behalf during his trial before Pilate.” Note there are quotes of what Jesus said in verse 34, 36-37. Yet I also want to note that what the skeptic state is “many” it should not be taken to mean that there was not a time where Jesus was silent during His trial before Pilate.
- Thus there is no contradiction here. Seems like the skeptics need to learn from our post How to Handle Bible Contradictions.
- We shouldn’t miss that worldviews are at play even with the skeptic’s objection to Christianity. The worldview of the author of the Skeptic Annotated Bible actually doesn’t even allow for such a thing as the law of non-contradiction to be meaningful and intelligible. In other words for him to try to disprove the Bible by pointing out that there’s a Bible contradiction doesn’t even make sense within his own worldview. Check out our post “Skeptic Annotated Bible Author’s Self-Defeating Worldview.”
[…] Was Jesus silent during his trial before Pilate? […]
Thanks for clearing this up. Very logical conclusion.
Blessings.
Does this have origins in the Jewish story-telling mindset or does this start from the Greek traditions (since both figured heavily in the culture of the day)?
I think it might be both Jewish and Geek mind set? Gospels as a literary form some scholars would say is a Greek literary form of biographies. Yet Matthew is primarily written to Jewish audience in mind, from the book quoting more OT passage than any other Gospels and from church history saying this is written to an original recipient that was Jewish. Yet with Mark which often is noted as the shortest Gospel for Roman soldiers I’ve also noticed from my study two years ago of how intensely the Old Testament is the structure of the book of Mark and its many allusions and motif from the Old Testament. John of course has a lot of Old Testament allusions too. So I think all these guys are assuming Jesus’ silence was a fulfillment of Isaiah 53:7 which predicts the Messiah at some point will be silent before His death, though that doesn’t mean He doesn’t speak at all as the Word of God. Hope that is in some sense helpful? How are you doing Mark?
It is helpful.
I, like Biden and his attempts to kill every aspect of oil and gas, am plugging along.
Thank you for this, Jim! May GOD continue to bless you in refuting these false Bible contradictions. The skeptic limits the coverage of verses so they can easily add it as a contradiction.
You are right the skeptic deliberately didn’t cover the verse right before the passage he quoted from Matthew and Mark. A very dishonest tactic because those verses show Jesus at some point did speak during His trial and can’t be used to say Jesus never spoke at all, even if He was silent most of the time. Going tangent: Did you see American Gospel on Netflix, Amazon or another streaming service?
The skeptics have their goals in mind and they’re after the stats. I’ve seen it on both iTunes Movies and Amazon for rent. It is not available (yet) on Netflix in this region of the world.
I am glad this one is more straightforward for you! Great job as always! Blessings to you, Nancy and kiddos!
Indeed this one is more straight forward. The skeptic is straight up wrong not looking at the verse before the passage in both Matthew and Mark that he cited. It seems intentional, especially since that was done twice for both his Matthew and Mark passage. I get there’s some passages that are hard. But some of the ones on the list of the Skeptic Annotated Bible shows the author has an axe to grind! I mean to quote our president, “Come on!” How is the weather for you guys, any snow this week?
Hahahahaha!! It is brutally cold and windy here, awful. Feels like 10degrees. Is it cold in your area too?
[…] Bible Contradiction? Was Jesus silent during his trial before Pilate? […]
Thank you for clarification.
You’re welcome! I hope with your post I share on Twitter you will get some hits and views!
Me too.
Thanks for thoroughly dissecting this bogus contradiction. Steve/Stephen Wells’ lack of scholastic rigor is on display once again!
You’re welcome and thank you for reading this! Steve Well’s work on Bible contradictions are totally inaccurate and unscholarly, it’s like atheists’ version of chick tracts, but worst with its cartoon caricature of God’s Word. Has there been snow for you guys this week?
RE: it’s like atheists’ version of chick tracts
Excellent analogy!
Yup, lots of snow and cold. I’ve used the snowblower every day since Monday. How’s things in SoCal?
Point 9 is devastating. Violating the law of non-contradiction is obviously wrong, but according to what standard, and what worldview?
You’re a goat with refuting these contradictions
Typically goat as a biblical motif is bad but in popular parlance its a compliment with this saying
That’s a compliment
A great compliment
Thank you for a great presentation refuting another imaginary contradiction by the skeptic.
I love how you called it that: “imaginary contradiction.” So accurate. Is this new profile picture of your son and daughter??
Thank you pastor Jim. You have become my most favourite person in the whole world .🤗 the photo is of my oldest grandson and me taken a few days ago when while on holidays .
Good explanation. I just wanted to say that this is a much needed and much appreciated project! It’s good to be able to refer to your posts when someone brings up a Bible contradiction from the internet and I feel unsure how to answer! I just wish this is available in Spanish
Amazing how context gives answers. Further amazing is how the skeptic didn’t read the verse right before the passage of Matthew and Mark.
[…] 2.) Bible Contradiction? Was Jesus silent during his trial before Pilate? […]
You can lead a horse to water but you can’t drink for it. You’ve shown the skeptics where they are wrong in misinterpreting the Bible and deliberate twisting of the Word, but whether they will take down this one from their online list is another matter
For any atheist reading this. your attack on Scripture is irrational. athiesm is as deceptive as your distractions, with which you keep yourself numb to your coming day of judgment
I was never a fan of the lists online bashing the Bible and saying its a contradiction. They always seemed awfully manipulative to me. Plus many of these sites looks like the same bad juvenile graphics as King James fundamentalists website, it already should make you question whether its a reputable site.
[…] Was Jesus silent during his trial before Pilate? NEW […]