For today’s post we will tackle the question the Skeptic Annotated Bible asked: Who appeared to Moses in the burning bush?
Here are the two answers which the skeptic believes shows a Bible contradiction:
God
“When the Lord saw that he turned aside to look, God called to him from the midst of the bush and said, “Moses, Moses!” And he said, “Here I am.”” (Exodus 3:4)
“But regarding the fact that the dead rise, have you not read in the book of Moses, in the passage about the burning bush, how God spoke to him, saying, ‘I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’?” (Mark 12:26)
An angel
“Then the angel of the Lord appeared to him in a blazing fire from the midst of a bush; and he looked, and behold, the bush was burning with fire, yet the bush was not being consumed.” ( Exodus 3:2)
“This Moses whom they disowned, saying, ‘Who made you a ruler and a judge?’ is the one whom God sent to be both a ruler and a deliverer with the help of the angel who appeared to him in the thorn bush.” (Acts 7:35)
(All Scriptural quotation comes from the New American Standard Bible)
Here’s a closer look at whether or not there is a contradiction:
- When dealing with skeptics’ claim of Bible contradictions it seems one can never be reminded enough of what exactly is a contradiction. A contradiction occurs when two or more claims conflict with one another so that they cannot simultaneously be true in the same sense and at the same time. To put it another way, a Bible contradiction exists when there are claims within the Bible that are mutually exclusive in the same sense and at the same time.
- One should be skeptical of whether this is a Bible contradiction given the Skeptic Annotated Bible’s track record of inaccurately handling the Bible. See the many examples of their error which we have responded to in this post: Collection of Posts Responding to Bible Contradictions. Of course that does not take away the need to respond to this claim of a contradiction, which is what the remainder of this post will do. But this observation should caution us to slow down and look more closely at the passages cited by the Skeptic Annotated Bible to see if they interpreted the passages properly to support their conclusion that it is a Bible contradiction.
- The skeptic tries to pit two passages (Exodus 3:4 and Mark 12:26) as affirming the claim “God appeared to Moses in the burning bush” against two other passages (Exodus 3:2 and Acts 7:35) as affirming “An angel appeared to Moses in the burning bush.”
- It is true that both Exodus 3:4 and Mark 12:26 affirm the claim “God made people deaf and blind.”
- Exodus 3:4 mentioned it was God as the subject who called out from the burning bush.
- Mark 12:26 is Jesus referencing Exodus 3:4 and Jesus points out that it was God speaking.
- Both Exodus 3:2 and Acts 7:35 does affirm “an angel appeared to Moses in the burning bush.”
- Note both verses mentioned “Angel.”
- Both verses also states the Angel was in the midst of the bush or in the bush.
- But the answers “God” and “Angel” are not mutually exclusive concerning the question “Who appeared to Moses in the burning bush?” The term “Angel” literally means messenger or someone who makes an announcement; it can have more than one referent.
- There of course the obvious reference of angels to heavenly beings that are servants of God. The Greek word “angelos” is used to translate “sons of God” in heaven before God in Job 1:6.
- There are times the term is used to refer to human messengers with messages on behalf of another human being; see Luke 7:24, 9:52 and James 2:25.
- Still there are times there is a “Messenger/Angel of Yahweh” who is a Divine Member of the Trinity. An example of that is found in Judges 6:11-24. Note how verse 22 record Gideon’s reaction to seeing the Messenger/Angel of Yahweh is that he didn’t die from seeing God (versus seeing a creaturely heavenly being).
- Given that there can be the Divine “Angel of Yahweh” which is a Divine appearance by God in a Theophany, we would not be surprised there are instances which God appear in a physical way and in fact we would expect them in Old Testament times in various points in redemptive history. So when we see this Messenger/Angel appear in the Bush to Moses and other passages also state that it was God who appeared to Moses, they are not mutually exclusive but rather these four passages together indicate it is the Divine Messenger of Yahweh.
- There is no contradiction here. Seems the skeptic needs to learn of How to Handle Bible Contradictions.
- We shouldn’t miss that worldviews are at play even with the skeptic’s objection to Christianity. The worldview of the author of the Skeptic Annotated Bible actually doesn’t even allow for such a thing as the law of non-contradiction to be meaningful and intelligible. In other words for him to try to disprove the Bible by pointing out that there’s a Bible contradiction doesn’t even make sense within his own worldview. Check out our post “Skeptic Annotated Bible Author’s Self-Defeating Worldview.”
[…] Who appeared to Moses in the burning bush? […]
This one is easily discerned when reading scriptures with an open mind and the Spirit of God (1Corinthians 2:14). The carnally minded are absent of this and therefore “proclaiming to be wise they became fools” (Romans 1:22). So sad that a person would have as a goal the refutation of His creators words to him.
It is sad indeed! All those verses you mentioned are relevant in describing the skeptics. I prayed for any skeptics reading this would see how we see it, as being consistent and also there’s a theology of Theophany before Christ’s incarnation!
[…] Bible Contradiction? Who appeared to Moses in the burning bush? — The Domain for Truth […]
Excellent insight and analysis! Thanks for making this happen.
Just read Acts 7 (VSS. 30-35), and was impressed with its consistency with other parts of scripture. Stephen mentions the burning bush and alternately the angel and God speaking to him. This is somewhat like Jn. 1 where it says The Logos was with God and was God. The persons of the Trinity act in concert and indwell each other. They are one in unity. The Acts 7 passage goes along with your post and reflects the Triunity of God.
It’s a mystery we, as Christians, hold and the skeptics will probably never understand. After all, when Israel joined themselves to idols, God told Judah to “leave them alone.” Also, we should not give what is holy to dogs or cast pearls before swine. Rom. 1 speaks about skeptics, innately knowing God, suppressing this knowledge by their love of sin.
Acts 7 does go along with these passages; you are right there is a similar reasoning as in John 1 that demonstrate that the Messenger of Yahweh is God Himself. We must indeed keep Romans 1 in view with our apologetics endeavor; most of the skeptics I think won’t even look at this post and still pontificate on social media where these posts are shared; I notice that since they are the first to comment and there’s no hits yet on those specific platforms and they commented as if they read it, but didn’t. It does seem though most of those who get the most from these posts are those using search engines to look up a specific attack from the Skeptic Annotated Bible and they are trying to see how these alleged contradictions are resolved. I supposed those are those that I pray the most for; they don’t comment most of the time but I see a steady stream of searches that end up here on the blog. MOst of the wordpress users who are Christians that we interact with seems to be solid enough to be discerning or at least don’t buy into the claims of the Skeptic Annotated Bible, obviously. Blessings to you today brother Alex, hope your day is blessed!
Same to you too, blessings
Thanks for your application of logic to a question from the other side (and meant to deceive by them).
Thanks for the encouraging comment! I hope to refute all of them on the skeptic annotated Bible and I’m praying God uses this to equip others!
Amen!
Reblogged this on Talmidimblogging.
Well defined.
Thanks for reading this Maw Maw and commenting; I pray this post would help those looking for answers! I hope you are doing well! Have a blessed Friday and tomorrow on Saturday!!!
Blessed weeked to you also.
Thanks for the thorough rebuttal. Steve/Stephen Wells presents himself as a critical Bible scholar so he should be aware of Theophanies. That’s T-101 stuff.
Yes sir that should be T-101! I wonder if Steve Wells ever blush presenting this publicly before an informed Christian audience. How is your shift?
RE: I wonder if Steve Wells ever blush presenting this publicly before an informed Christian audience.
Oh, man. He would be laughed at.
RE: shift
Thanks! It looks like a moderate workload for the weekend unless they add to it. I worked so hard last weekend that I resolved not to do that again.
How’s your Friday going? Are you back in your pre-vaca routine yet?
I been noticing in your series there’s a number of instances where these alleged contradictions the atheist bring up are bifurcation fallacies.
The atheists must have been in a hurry to find a problem to make this silly objection
It would be more ridiculous if they took their time and still come up with junk like this “contradiction”
You are right
Sing Glory Glory Hallelujah and Maranatha too our LORD / KING JESUS-YESHUA CHRIST-MESSIAH!!
Love ❤ Always and Shalom, YSIC \o/
Kristi Ann
Amen Kristi! God’s Word still stands as true despite the skeptics attacks, amen???
It is absolutely impossible for the skeptic or any unbeliever to understand the significance of the burning bush. Great refutation.
Thanks Mandy for reading this. Hope your Lord’s Day tomorrow goes well!
You can learn so much about the Bible from your series
If one looks for opportunities to learn, one can also learn from one’s enemies
Yes its an opportunity to figure out what the Bible really says, and also how not to misinterpret the Bible
SlimJim I am watching your Twitter debate and you are giving that atheist a beating. He didn’t know what he stepped into
[…] 2.) Bible Contradiction? Who appeared to Moses in the burning bush? […]