For today’s post we will tackle the question the Skeptic Annotated Bible asked: Should we try to please others?
Here are the two answers which the skeptic believes shows a Bible contradiction:
Yes
“Each of us is to please his neighbor for his good, to his edification.” (Romans 15:2)
“just as I also please everyone in all things, not seeking my own benefit but the benefit of the many, so that they may be saved.” (1 Corinthians 10:33)
No
“For am I now seeking the favor of people, or of God? Or am I striving to please people? If I were still trying to please people, I would not be a bond-servant of Christ.” (Galatians 1:10)
(All Scriptural quotation comes from the New American Standard Bible)
Here’s a closer look at whether or not there is a contradiction:
- When dealing with skeptics’ claim of Bible contradictions it seems one can never be reminded enough of what exactly is a contradiction. A contradiction occurs when two or more claims conflict with one another so that they cannot simultaneously be true in the same sense and at the same time. To put it another way, a Bible contradiction exists when there are claims within the Bible that are mutually exclusive in the same sense and at the same time.
- One should be skeptical of whether this is a Bible contradiction given the Skeptic Annotated Bible’s track record of inaccurately handling the Bible. See the many examples of their error which we have responded to in this post: Collection of Posts Responding to Bible Contradictions. Of course that does not take away the need to respond to this claim of a contradiction, which is what the remainder of this post will do. But this observation should caution us to slow down and look more closely at the passages cited by the Skeptic Annotated Bible to see if they interpreted the passages properly to support their conclusion that it is a Bible contradiction.
- The skeptic tries to pit 1 Romans 15:2 and 1 Corinthians 10:33 as affirming the claim “We should please others” against Galatians 1:10 as affirming “We should not please others.”
- I think what helps with seeing there’s not a contradiction with these passages is to consider what is the ultimate goal with pleasing people in different situations. Does it ultimately please God or not? It would be the case that when the end goal of pleasing someone does not glorify God, then it shouldn’t be done; but if the end goal of pleasing someone in a specific situation does result in glorifying God, then we should not be surprised that there’s passages in the Scriptures that permit or command it.
- Romans 15:2 talks about pleasing others for the goal of their good. It also explains further that is should be done if it results in their edification. The term for edification is a Greek term that describe constructing a building. So when there’s someone you can build them up in their faith and their walk with God then you should do so to please them.
- 1 Corinthians 10:33 talk about pleasing others where the aim or result is “so that they may be saved.” This is a good thing and God is glorified with salvation. So thus this type of situation we pursue with pleasing others.
- Galatians 1:10 is in the context of a section where Paul talk about how people should not change the Gospel (see Galatians 1:8-9). In Galatians 1:10 Paul is thus talking about how he would not change the Gospel message in order to please people. Changing the Gospel of course would not glorify God. In fact it would not be loving to people (for false Gospel will damn and not save people). So Paul in strong terms in Galatians 1:10 talk about not changing the Gospel in order to please people.
- It is interesting that 1 Corinthians 10:33 and Galatians 1:10 are actually compatible and not contradictory. Both verses are two sides of the coin if you will. 1 Corinthians 10:3 talks about pleasing people in the context of the goal with people’s salvation; but if it is a case of pleasing people that is the opposite of saving them, one shouldn’t pursue it and that’s what Galatians 1:10 is saying.
- There is no contradiction here. Seems the skeptic needs to learn of How to Handle Bible Contradictions.
- We shouldn’t miss that worldviews are at play even with the skeptic’s objection to Christianity. The worldview of the author of the Skeptic Annotated Bible actually doesn’t even allow for such a thing as the law of non-contradiction to be meaningful and intelligible. In other words for him to try to disprove the Bible by pointing out that there’s a Bible contradiction doesn’t even make sense within his own worldview. Check out our post “Skeptic Annotated Bible Author’s Self-Defeating Worldview.”
[…] Should we try to please others? […]
When I get back on Twitter, I’ll be sharing this one. Good job…AGAIN!
Thanks!! I appreciate it. Praying your month would be productive while being away from Twitter! How has that been going so far??
Thank you for your prayers. I won’t lie: I miss the interactions and “news” updates. But it’s been good to focus on other things. I’m looking forward to being back in the know in February
Thanks for the insight. This is it: “It is interesting that 1 Corinthians 10:33 and Galatians 1:10 are actually compatible and not contradictory. Both verses are two sides of the coin if you will.”
Shalom!
Thanks for reading this. Thanks for noting that this sentence stood out to you! Blessings and shalom to you too Michael!!!
Thanks for this thorough rebuttal of another one of Steve/Stephen Wells’ alleged contradictions. Once again, Wells picks from the false dichotomy cherry tree. Most middle-school students could perceive his unscholarly illogic.
Yes sir once again the skeptics is trying too hard with unscholarly illogic. I was more tired and this took longer than it should of when I wrote this post. But it also might be the exhaustion of refuting something so off in the skeptics bad thought process, kind of like how you refute bad reasoning of RC apologists where it’s so tangled up you probably wonder sometimes where to begin to unravel it. How many weeks ahead are you with drafts of your ongoing Friday series?
RE: t’s so tangled up you probably wonder sometimes where to begin to unravel it.
I get you 100% and can sympathize with your efforts rebutting Wells.
Yes, answering the Catholic apologist can be so tedious and draining. His arguments are sometimes so convoluted and even deceitful. I don’t get too far ahead on the Broussard posts. I generally research and write them over the course of two days – usually Wednesday and Thursday – for the following week’s Friday post.
If an atheist said this to me I would cringe. Right away when I read point 4 it was enough for me to see through the unbeliever’s objection
Glad you saw the problem here with the skeptics right away even before I finished the final thoughts on it. Have a blessed week and thanks for sharing this on mewe
It was my pleasure to do so
Wow, That’s not even a logical “reach” of a contradiction, even on the surface.
I think the skeptic really is out there to say this is a contradiction. I admit I don’t think the skeptic did a good job at all here. Thanks for reading this Gary! Have you been outdoors today?
Yes I’ve been outside. Full moon coming up and everything is covered in a heavy frost. It’s quite cold. I’ll post a couple of pictures. The imagination of God with frost alone is utterly beyond description.
I have no comments, everyone said them all.
Thanks! What’s the weather degrees difference between PA and TX where you are at now???
25-30 degree difference!
Good point that is missed by those claiming there is a contradiction between pleasing and not pleasing people: “Does it ultimately please God or not?”
Thanks Frank for reading this! I think that question would unravel the skeptic’s claim of a contradiction real quick! Have a blessed Friday and weekend!
It’s ridiculous to think of the serious sins committed by the nonbelievers to twist the Bible for some petty excuse to dismiss God and live in sin
It is rather sad they will twist the Scripture for a little objection that doesn’t amount to much…when the consequences is so heavy
Sad and they are still responsible
[…] Bible Contradiction? Should we try to please others? — The Domain for Truth […]
At first glance I wonder how this can be solved but you showed us that consideration of motivation resolves this dilemma
Thanks for reading this response post
The listings linked in point of all your posts are helpful
I think the Skeptic’s missed the forest for the trees, as you point out so clearly. Praising God for your pastoral ministry on this Lord’s Day!
wow thanks for reading this and for your praise to God! Today I preached for my senior pastor’s 40th anniversary of being a pastor; we went to church early to decorate and left late to clean up. Sometimes doing these apologetics post answering the skeptics are great mental breaks and also edifying! Hope your Sunday went well??
Sounds like a very long but satisfying Lord’s Day, Jimmy. It is good to honor those who have served God faithfully, especially one who is close to you in ministry. I know it must have blessed him to experience the outpouring of love and support. For me, after a long time it was so good to see friends back at my church! God is so good. I pray for a heart more sensitive to Him, less sensitive for myself. More ready to leap to do his desires, less my own in spite of my limitations.
[…] 2.) Bible Contradiction? Should we try to please others? […]
Does it ultimately please God or not? It would be the case that when the end goal of pleasing someone does not glorify God, then it shouldn’t be done; but if the end goal of pleasing someone in a specific situation does result in glorifying God, then we should not be surprised that there’s passages in the Scriptures that permit or command it. RIGHT ON
Amen sister Barbara, thanks for reading this! May you continue to be a light on Gab and elsewhere!