Here are links related to Presuppositional apologetics’ gathered from March 8th-14th, 2023. There’s a lot of good links for this installment! Enjoy!
1.) Cave to the Cross’ TAG, Trinity, & Negative Arguments – Ep.216 – Apologetics By John Frame – Transcendental Argument – Part 3
2.) Bible Contradiction? Where did Jesus tell his disciples to go after his resurrection?
3.) Evangelism and Apologetics
4.) Van Til does believe in the Perspicuity of Natural Revelation
5.)Darwinists, Leave those Hospitals Alone!
8.) OF PRESUPPOSITIONAL APOLOGETICS
Missed the last round up? Check out the re-blogged post from a friend
The Domain for Truth 
Reblogged this on clydeherrin.
Thanks for the listing! I enjoyed the C2TC guys’ podcast this morning about negative vs. positive arguments. Patrick and Tony are often over my head (especially when discussing Frame and Van Til), but I enjoy being stretched a bit.
Glad you enjoyed it, even with its stretch! Has the cold weather started coming down???
RE: weather
It’s 22F right now and I’ll have to snowblow later this morning after more snow fell last night, BUT the 10-day forecast shows seven days with 45F+ highs!
What’s the weather like down south?
Excellent brother. This one looks interesting “Evangelism and Apologetics”.
Blessings.
Grateful you are checking links out
Bahnsen provides good reasons to avoid neutrality in apologetics in iink 3. Apologists who favor neutrality seem to me to expose their own lack of belief in those Christian presuppositions they are willing to put aside.
Thanks for reading this round up and the link!!!
[…] Mid-March 2023 Presuppositional Apologetics’ Links — The Domain for Truth […]
Reblogged this on My Logos Word.
@Veritasdomain Jim, there are a couple of Christian evidences apologetics that I would like to see effectuated. One is the prophecy of Ezekiel on Tyre which is predicted to be destroyed, yet there is a city we call Tyre today. Is the standard explanation that the mainland city was permanently destroyed, though the Island where the people moved remains, an adequate explanation. I recall that somebody published a book called something like “When prophecy fails” claiming Ezekiel’s prophecy failed. Then there is the prophecy of Nebuchadnezzar conquering Egypt & a captivity & return of the Egyptians, which I think commonly ancient historians do not recognize as having happened.@Veritasdomain Jim, there are a couple of Christian evidences apologetics that I would like to see effectuated. One is the prophecy of Ezekiel on Tyre which is predicted to be destroyed, yet there is a city we call Tyre today. Is the standard explanation that the mainland city was permanently destroyed, though the Island where the people moved remains, an adequate explanation. I recall that somebody published a book called something like “When prophecy fails” claiming Ezekiel’s prophecy failed. Then there is the prophecy of Nebuchadnezzar conquering Egypt & a captivity & return of the Egyptians, which I think commonly ancient historians do not recognize as having happened.@Veritasdomain Jim, there are a couple of Christian evidences apologetics that I would like to see effectuated. One is the prophecy of Ezekiel on Tyre which is predicted to be destroyed, yet there is a city we call Tyre today. Is the standard explanation that the mainland city was permanently destroyed, though the Island where the people moved remains, an adequate explanation. I recall that somebody published a book called something like “When prophecy fails” claiming Ezekiel’s prophecy failed. Then there is the prophecy of Nebuchadnezzar conquering Egypt & a captivity & return of the Egyptians, which I think commonly ancient historians do not recognize as having happened.@Veritasdomain Jim, there are a couple of Christian evidences apologetics that I would like to see effectuated. One is the prophecy of Ezekiel on Tyre which is predicted to be destroyed, yet there is a city we call Tyre today. Is the standard explanation that the mainland city was permanently destroyed, though the Island where the people moved remains, an adequate explanation. I recall that somebody published a book called something like “When prophecy fails” claiming Ezekiel’s prophecy failed. Then there is the prophecy of Nebuchadnezzar conquering Egypt & a captivity & return of the Egyptians, which I think commonly ancient historians do not recognize as having happened.
It’s sad to see nonbelievers employ the fallacy of argument from silence against the Bible.