Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Cornelius Van Til’ Category

Here are links related to Presuppositional apologetics gathered between September 8th-14th, 2017.

1.) Christian Paradigm Power: Atheism is Impossible

2.) THE LOGICAL PROBLEM WITH EVOLUTION

3.) Unique Way to Refute the Jehovah’s Witnesses

4.) What’s wrong with Hindu pantheism?

 

Missed the last round up?  Check out the re-blogged post from a friend OR that of Another REBLOG HERE

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

These are links concerning Presuppositional apologetics gathered from September 1st-7th, 2017.

1.) Evaluating “The Circular Argument” Against Presuppositionalism

2.) Frank Turek: How Atheists Presuppose God for Science

3.) In Opposing Naturalism in Science, the Bible is More Foundational than Design

4.) An atheist dilemma

6.) Refuting the Critics #3

7.) What Wendy Fails to Prove: Refuting Inerrancy-Denying Arguments

Missed the last round up?  Check out the re-blogged post from a friend OR that of Another REBLOG HERE

Read Full Post »

I disagree with Frank Turek over many other areas but I thought this clip was helpful to strengthen one’s Presuppositional apologetics, though of course one must still be critical.

Frank Turek argues here how atheist needs God for science to be intelligible and meaningful.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

This is a collection of links from August 8th-31st, 2017.  It is a collection of a lengthier period of time since I was gone on missions earlier this month.

1.) Guest Post: In Opposing Naturalism in Science, the Bible is More Foundational than Design

2.) The Death of Darwinian Evolution: To Outer Darkness

3.) 

4.) Presuppositional Apologetics and Personal Evangelism

5.) R.C. Sproul and Greg Bahnsen Debate Transcript

6.) Should We Believe That Roses Are Real? 

 

Read Full Post »

Here are the links related to Presuppositional Apologetics gathered between August 1st-7th, 2017.

1.) Christianity: The Only Worldview of Truth

2.) No Absolute Truth

3.) Logic and Lily Pads

4.) Do Men Need Evidence For God Or Persuasion Of Guilt?

5.) SAMPLE QUESTIONS FOR APOLOGETICS EXAM

 

Missed the last round up?  Check out the re-blogged post from a friend OR that of Another REBLOG HERE

Read Full Post »

This latest round up has a lot more stuff than usual!

Here are the links related to Presuppositional Apologetics gathered between July 22nd-31st, 2017.

1.) Misrepresentation: Do Presuppositionalists conflate the moral depravity in the Bible with human reasoning?

2.) Theism: Plain or Necessary?

3.) A BRIEF SUMMARY OF PRESUPPOSITIONAL APOLOGETICS

4.) Presuppositional Apologetics Lectures: Patrick Hines on Youtube

6.) The Classical Apologists Facepalming Misuse of Scripture

7.) Refuting the Critics #1

8.) Dawkins Blackballed for his Views on Islam

9.) Notes on Evil and Evidence

10.) Reformed Forum’s Upcoming 2017 Conference: The Reformation of Apologetics

12.) Feedback: Is Atheism a Religion?

13.) God Made Man and Woman. PERIOD. Then Back to William Lane Craig and Presuppositionalism

 

Missed the last round up?  Check out the re-blogged post from a friend OR that of Another REBLOG HERE

Read Full Post »

The last two weeks seems to have more internet controversies against Presuppositional apologetics from various quarters.  I think it is always unfortunate when Christians misrepresent other Christians and in this post I want to deal with an objection against Presuppositional apologetics.

I have wrote a previous post titled “ which dealt with this particular critic.  The critic have also wrote the following:

Further, I think that the presuppositionalist has just misunderstood the doctrine of total depravity. Depravity is a moral concept, not a qualitative concept. The whole of humanity is fallen, but not depraved. Human eyesight, for instance, is fallen. People need to wear glasses. It is not depraved. When a Christian is born again, they are not given new eyesight. Likewise, human reason is not qualitatively changed when they become a Christian. If that were the case, then non-Christians would be utterly unreasonable. The natural man would have no capacity to interact with the world on an intellectual level. But Paul said that the natural man does not understand the things of the Spirit of God (1st Corinthians 2:14). If we are going to engage with and against presuppositional apologetics, we need to understand that it is a foolish mistake to conflate the moral depravity in the Bible with human reasoning.

Here’s my thoughts:

(more…)

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »