Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Presuppositiona apologetics’

Here are Presuppositional apologetics’ links gathered between August 15-21st, 2018.

1.)  The Problems of Evil Conference MP3s

2.) HONORING GOD IN YOUR APOLOGETICS

3.) Pastor Mike Winger on Presuppositionalism

4.) Cosmic simulation

5.) Would Paul the Apostle Debate Modern Evolutionists?

6.) The Folly of Atheism & Deism

7.) God Doesn’t Believe in Atheists

8.)

 

Missed the last round up?  Check out the re-blogged post from a friend or here or here.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Here’s an older debate with Jeff Durbin and Vocab Malone that Vocab has recently uploaded on his Youtube channel.  The two of them teamed up to debate two opponents concerning the worldview of Christianity and atheism.

What Jeff Durbin does is an example of Presuppositional apologetics in action.

Read Full Post »

Here are the links related to Presuppositional apologetics gathered between January 22nd-31st, 2018.

1.) Defeating Relativism

2.) Where Josh McDowell and Presuppositionalists Agree: The Most Powerful Evidence for the Christian Faith

3.) Review: Apologetics: A Justification of Christian Belief

4.) Jason Lisle “The Ultimate Proof of Creation” Lecture at The Master’s Seminary

5.) Refuting Islam at Ground Level

6.) How to Defend the Christian Faith: Four Principles to Get Started

7.) Absolutely Subjective Moral Values

8.) Politics as Religion

9.) Atheists Know God Exists

10.) The Bible: is it guilty until proven innocent?

 

Missed the last round up?  Check out the re-blogged post from a friend OR that of Another REBLOG HERE

Read Full Post »

As I’m going over this with a group of guys from my church I thought the following questions might be helpful for individuals and small groups to facilitate discussions and learning based upon the apologetics’ book “Ultimate Proof of Creation” by Jason Lisle.  It is a book that teaches Presuppositional apologetics that engages apologetics at the level of worldview.  Cornelius Van Til was instrumental in beginning this form of apologetics and others have developed and applied it.

For discussion questions for previous chapters click on the following:

Chapter 2

Chapter 3

Chapter 4

The questions in this post will be for chapter 5 of the book.  Each question is followed by page numbers in parenthesis where the answer can be found.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

This past weekend there was a Theology Conference hosted by Reformed Forum and this year the subject is on the Reformation of Apologetics which focuses a lot on how Reformed Theology shapes apologetics’ methodology and Presuppositional apologetics.

Here’s a description of the conference from their website:

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Here are links related to Presuppositional apologetics gathered between September 22nd-30th, 2017.

1.) God Must Exist: The Proper Paradigm for Science

2.) This Is Apologetics: an Argument from Certainty

3.) Review: Cornelius Van Til: An Analysis of His Thoughts

4.) Bill Nye the Atheism Shill Guy Rides Again by Cowboy Bob Sorensen

5.) CSI Apologetics: Thoughts on Using Evidence in Apologetic Methodology

7.) Human Beings – the New Morality and Kind Determination

8.) Reverse ontological argument? A risky ploy for an atheist

9.) Are Humans Unique? Darwinians Say, “No.” God says, “Yes.”

 

Missed the last round up?  Check out the re-blogged post from a friend OR that of Another REBLOG HERE

Read Full Post »

John Frame. Cornelius Van Til: An Analysis of His Thoughts.  Phillipsburg, NJ: Presbyterian and Reformed Publishing, September 1st 1995. 463 pp.

5 out of 5

Purchase: Westminster Amazon

I finally got around to reading and finishing John Frame’s interpretation of Christian apologist and theologian Cornelius Van Til.  This is probably long overdue given how long my interests is with Presuppositional apologetics and also having read so much of Frame’s works daily in my life for the last couple of years.  I must say that I probably appreciated this work in the current place in my life than I would have appreciated it ten years ago.  I do not always agree with John Frame being myself more in line with Greg Bahnsen’s approach towards apologetics but I have always found that even when I disagree with Frame he certainly gives much fuel for thought and as a result with interacting with his writings I have become more nuanced and achieved a better synthesis of what to believe.

(more…)

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »