Ryan M. Reeves and Charles E. Hill. Know How We Got Our Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, August 7, 2018. 208 pp.
5 out of 5
Purchase: Amazon
How did we get our Bible and what is the history of the transmission of the Christian Bible? Christians who love God and the Bible should care about this question! So here is a great resource for general readers by two authors that are qualified to teach us about this matter. The first author is Ryan Reeves, an Associate Professor of Historical Theology at Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary and the second author is Charles E. Hill Professor Emeritus of New Testament and Early Christianity. Charles Hill has also written and edited books related to text of Scripture and manuscripts. Yet they wrote in a way that was accessible for the general Christian audience to understand all the while being informative and narrating the history and contexts of Bible editions.
After an introductory chapter, the second chapter is on the Old Testament that also talked about Dead Sea Scroll. Chapter three was on the Septuagint. Here I thought it was interesting that the order of the books was changed and the grouping is largely based upon literary forms and our Christian canonical order is largely influenced by the Septuagint. Chapter four is on the New Testament. Chapter five is on the early Christians. Chapter six is on the Vulgate. Chapter seven is on the Medieval Bible. Chapter eight is on John Wycliffe’s Bible then the next chapter is on the Reformation. Chapter ten is on the Protestant Bible in English and chapter eleven is on the King James Bible. Chapter twelve is on the modern Bible and chapter thirteen is on the Bible Today and Tomorrow.
I like the format. After each chapter are study questions based upon the reading along with recommended readings.
One of the chapters I learned a lot about is on Medieval Bible. I guess I never appreciated the medieval contribution before. As Europe was transitioning away from Latin we see the impact in this is felt in other ways: the name Bible is coined during this time from the Latin word meaning book, the effort to reform Latin copies of manuscripts we see better handwriting to lower chance of copy errors and also standardizing verses for the Bible. Copying Bibles was hard work and took a lot of time and involved a high cost. A good pace for a monastery would produce two to four Bibles annually. It is so costly Bibles were never sold commercially and also people’s illiteracy. I think this chapter also cover how there was few who could afford buying the whole Bible too since the economy then didn’t have a middle class and this was before the Printing Press allowing mass printing of the Bible. Chapter five on the early Christians was also of interests to me since it does touch on the Canon. I learned here the early church leader Justin Martyr shared the Jewish canon and didn’t embrace Apocrypha. Likewise Melito of Sardis did not hold to the Apocrypha. I also appreciate learning about the Geneva Bible in contrast to King James Bible. Geneva Bible was used by those who were more non-conformists than those who were tolerating of the official Church of England. It was seen as a politically subversive Bible throughout history. The final chapter’s discussion about the role of Bible Society to help spread the Gospel through Bible translations and distribution was also very informative and fascinating; I’m grateful for Christians in the past work here.
This is a book I recommend. Even if one does know about Bible editions in history one will find this book enjoyable and one might still learn something from this book.
Thanks for the great resource. This is a very important topic for all of us to gain more insight.
Blessings.
Since the Bible is from God, we can take it as inerrant. It becomes evidence that we should take as a presupposition for any further investigations. So the history of how we obtained what we use today as a Bible is important. That would be where human fallibility could attempt to distort the evidence.
Amen brother well stated. The history is fascinating and amazing!! God is providential! Blessings to you Frank.
Sounds very interesting! Thanks for the review! Many who hold the KJV 1611-Only view would be surprised at the history of the English translation of the Bible. BTW, Jerome, who translated the Hebrew OT and Greek NT into the Latin Vulgate also did not consider the apocryphal books as Scriptural.
Agreed with your comment about Jerome! It’s also interesting to see resistance to Jerome’s desire to go back to the Hebrew for his Latin translation, reminds me how the Western church that evolved into Roman Catholicism seem to always be resistant to certain efforts with translation of the Bible…trying to squeeze out more reviews the next few days as the year is almost over and I am catching up to my goal of 52 books a year. Sometimes I delay writing a review right away! I imagine you feel the same with writing your latest review, it takes some time after finishing a book to write a review, or did you write one up right away?
I know exactly what you mean about grinding out book reviews. I finished a book a few days ago and I’m not looking forward to writing the review. The leaf campaign and that lousy IFB book really messed with my reading the last 6 weeks. 52 books is quite an accomplishment, especially with some of the intense theology and philosophy books that you read. I just checked my 2021 list and I’m at 28 books for the year. I’m looking forward to jump-starting my reading again with my long break from work.
[…] Review: Know How We Got Our Bible — The Domain for Truth […]
Sounds like a good resource to have on hand for the inquiring congregant.
Good idea! It’s always good to have ideas of books to recommend (and one have read) for different topics. Blessings to you James and thanks for visiting!!
I think so too
“I also appreciate learning about the Geneva Bible in contrast to King James Bible. Geneva Bible was used by those who were more non-conformists than those who were tolerating of the official Church of England.” By my casual reading over the years, this interpretation, while possibly substantially true, leaves out a lot. 😉 If I were a billionaire one of the things I would have done was commission research on this. As a former KJV-Only person, the only thing I really have against the KJV is too many people believe it’s the *only* English-language translation one should use. To my mind now, the specific manuscripts used for translation are key. 🙂
Thanks for this, Jim! In today’s world, it is not only important to know The Bible, but to know about The Bible, as well.
Good distinction with knowing the BIble and facts and truth surrounding the Bible (its history, canonicity, etc). So what’s the weather like these days in South Carolina?
A bit cold and drizzly, Jim! 😀
What a great book review! I learn from just reading your summary and am reminded again of what an awesome compendium of God-breathed texts that are the Bible we have been bequeathed. Why? Well, it’s the sword of the Spirit who never leaves us defenseless, especially in these last days.
A big amen to this ” what an awesome compendium of God-breathed texts that are the Bible we have been bequeathed.” Amen! I find the more I study the Word of God the more I’m amazed and love God more; it never gets old!!!
Wishing you a blessed Christmas!
I will be getting this book, thank you!!!!!! How was study?! Life is hectic right now and should be back to normal for next Tuesday!!!!
Study went well! I imagine life got really busy this holiday season with siblings, mom and family! I hope you are able to get some rest…wow isn’t it 2 AM in PA???? Staying up or just woke up???
Just woke up, praying I will go back to sleep! So glad to hear about study!!! How are things y’all’s way?!
Amen. Thank you.
You’re welcome! Glad to see you on here and FB! Appreciate so much your love and support Maw Maw!!
I love you my Grand.
This is a new Villian🦹♂️ I never heard of
I would chuck out Ehrman! This might be a good and sound substitute!
This series is great